TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessee prevails in disallowance case under IT rules -14</h1> <h3>Adani Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Also known as Adani Agro Private Limited) Versus The DCIT Circle-1 (1) (1) Ahmedabad (Vice-Versa)</h3> Adani Properties Pvt. Ltd. (Also known as Adani Agro Private Limited) Versus The DCIT Circle-1 (1) (1) Ahmedabad (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of Income Tax Rules2. Appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)Issue 1: Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of Income Tax RulesIn the case at hand, the Assessee and Revenue filed cross-appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) concerning the disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14. The Assessee disputed the disallowance of Rs. 1,38,04,106 under section 14A r.w.r. 8D, arguing that no such disallowance was warranted as they had already disallowed interest expenditure attributable to earning exempt income. The Revenue, on the other hand, contested the restriction of disallowance to Rs. 1,38,04,106 by the CIT(A), seeking to uphold the original disallowance of Rs. 23,29,20,266. The dispute revolved around the correct calculation and application of disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules.Issue 2: Appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)The Assessee raised grounds of appeal against the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold a partial disallowance of Rs. 1,38,04,106 under section 14A read with rule 8D. The Assessee also invoked the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a similar case to argue that the disallowance should not exceed the exempt income earned. The Revenue, on the other hand, challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict the disallowance to Rs. 1,38,04,106 instead of the original amount of Rs. 23,29,20,266. Both parties presented their arguments before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the correctness of their respective positions based on the facts and legal provisions.In the final judgment, the Appellate Tribunal analyzed the facts and legal precedents, including the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a similar case, to determine the appropriate disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules. The Tribunal held that the disallowance amount cannot exceed the disallowance made by the Assessee in their income tax return, which was Rs. 29,35,81,617. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the additional disallowance imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). Both the Assessee's and Revenue's appeals were decided in favor of the Assessee, allowing the Assessee's appeal and dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The judgment was delivered on 06/01/2020 by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
