Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether free samples distributed by a pharmaceutical company to doctors and others could be brought to fringe benefit tax in the absence of an employer-employee relationship between the assessee and the recipients.
Analysis: Fringe benefit tax under Chapter XXII-H of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is attracted only where fringe benefits are provided or deemed to have been provided by an employer to its employees. The charging provision makes the employer-employee relationship the basis of the levy. The distribution of free samples to doctors and others did not involve any such relationship, and the revenue had not established that the expenditure fell within the taxable net on that footing. The earlier view relied upon by the Tribunal also proceeded on the same principle that the levy cannot stand without the foundational employer-employee nexus.
Conclusion: The free samples distributed to doctors and others were not liable to fringe benefit tax, as the essential employer-employee relationship was absent.