TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court directs prompt consideration of service tax claim, grants petitioner opportunity to be heard.</h1> <h3>Sajeevan P.A., Versus State Of Kerala</h3> The court directed the 2nd respondent to promptly consider the petitioner's claim for reimbursement of service tax paid, emphasizing the importance of a ... Levy of service tax - construction works - grant of reimbursement of service tax - petitioner would contend that he has already paid service tax on the works contract executed by him and that therefore, as per the norms he is eligible to get reimbursement of the service tax paid - HELD THAT:- It is ordered in the interest of justice that the 2nd respondent will take up the matters raised in Ext.P8 for consideration and after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, will render a considered decision thereon on the matters raised therein, without much delay, preferably within a period of 6 to 8 weeks, from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment. Petition disposed off. Issues Involved:Claim for reimbursement of service tax paid by the petitionerAnalysis:The petitioner completed two construction contracts and paid service tax imposed from 01.04.2015. The State Government issued an order directing payment of service tax and subsequent claim for reimbursement. The petitioner filed a claim for reimbursement, which was rejected based on a misunderstanding. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief, including quashing the rejection order, reimbursement of the service tax paid, and a declaration of eligibility for reimbursement.The petitioner argued that he is entitled to reimbursement as he has already paid the service tax as per the norms. The court considered the facts and circumstances and directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's claim for reimbursement without delay. The 3rd respondent was also instructed to provide a report on the petitioner's claim of having paid the service tax, which would be considered by the 2nd respondent. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to be heard during the decision-making process.The court emphasized the importance of rendering a decision on the reimbursement claim promptly, preferably within 6 to 8 weeks. The 2nd respondent was directed to consider all relevant submissions and the report from the 3rd respondent before making a decision. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, ensuring a fair consideration of the petitioner's claim for reimbursement of the service tax paid.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
