Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (1) TMI 726 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules Section 50C doesn't apply to leasehold transfer, directs AO to re-compute. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights. It directed the AO to ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules Section 50C doesn't apply to leasehold transfer, directs AO to re-compute.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights. It directed the AO to re-compute the capital gains/loss based on the actual consideration received by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the transfer of leasehold rights.
                          2. Computation of Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and disallowance of Long-Term Capital Loss (LTCL).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the transfer of leasehold rights:

                          The primary issue in this case was whether Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with the valuation of land or building or both for the purpose of computing capital gains, applies to the transfer of leasehold rights. The assessee contended that Section 50C should not apply as the transaction involved only the transfer of leasehold rights and not the transfer of land or building.

                          The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] had concluded that the provisions of Section 50C were applicable, treating the leasehold rights as equivalent to the transfer of a building. This resulted in the adoption of the stamp duty value of Rs. 1,64,89,440/- instead of the actual consideration of Rs. 1,25,92,000/- received by the assessee, leading to an addition of Rs. 24,28,372/- to the total income of the assessee.

                          Upon appeal, the Tribunal analyzed the language of Section 50C, which specifies that the section applies to the transfer of a capital asset "being land or building or both." The Tribunal emphasized that Section 50C is a deeming provision and should be strictly construed. It noted that the section does not extend to "any right in land or building," which includes leasehold rights.

                          The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including decisions from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and various ITAT benches, which supported the view that Section 50C does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights. The Tribunal concluded that since the assessee transferred only leasehold rights and not land or building, Section 50C could not be invoked.

                          2. Computation of Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) and disallowance of Long-Term Capital Loss (LTCL):

                          The second issue was the computation of LTCG and the disallowance of LTCL claimed by the assessee. The assessee had reported a long-term capital loss of Rs. 14,72,545/- from the transfer of leasehold rights, which was disallowed by the AO based on the application of Section 50C.

                          The Tribunal, having determined that Section 50C was not applicable, directed that the full value of consideration for the transfer should be taken as Rs. 1,25,92,000/-. Consequently, the capital gain/loss should be recomputed based on this consideration.

                          The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed the AO to re-compute the capital gains/loss as per the law, taking the actual consideration of Rs. 1,25,92,000/- into account.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, does not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights. It directed the AO to re-compute the capital gains/loss based on the actual consideration received by the assessee. The impugned order of the CIT(A) was set aside, and the AO was instructed to re-compute the capital gains/loss accordingly. The order was pronounced in the open court on 17th January 2020.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found