Clarification on Including Profits in Total Capital for Tax Relief

The High Court of Allahabad clarified that profits earned from new industrial units must be included in the computation of total capital employed for relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as per rule 19(5) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court rejected the department's argument to exclude the profits, emphasizing the rule's unambiguous language. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs of Rs. 200.

---

---

Issues: Interpretation of rule 19(5) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 regarding the computation of capital employed for relief under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

In this judgment by the High Court of Allahabad, the court addressed a reference under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning the computation of capital employed for the purpose of relief under section 84 of the Act. The case involved an assessee, a limited company, which had set up two new industrial units in the relevant previous year. The question was whether the profits earned from these new undertakings should be included in the computation of total capital employed for relief under section 84. The court noted that rule 19(5) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, mandated that profits earned from a new undertaking should be added to the capital employed unless the contrary is shown. The court highlighted that the rule clearly stated that profits accrued evenly throughout the year and increased the capital employed. The court emphasized that the rule was unambiguous and did not allow for any other interpretation. The court rejected the department's argument that the profits could be excluded from the computation, as it did not align with the clear language of the rule.

The court clarified a confusion in the question framed by the Tribunal, stating that the assessee had claimed the entire profits earned from the new undertakings, not just half as suggested. The Income-tax Officer had initially disallowed the claim, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had both upheld the assessee's position. The court highlighted a previous assessment year where a similar situation had occurred, but in the year under consideration, the entire profits were claimed and allowed. The court reframed the question to focus on whether the profits from the new undertakings should be included in the computation of capital employed. The court ultimately answered the reframed question in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the department. The court awarded costs to the assessee, assessing it at Rs. 200.

---