Court Upholds Revenue's Appeal on Depreciation of Electronic Meters

The court allowed exemptions in applications subject to exceptions after condoning a delay in re-filing. The Revenue's appeal against an ITAT order on depreciation of electronic meters was upheld, emphasizing compliance with the remand order for finality. The court directed the AO to address unresolved issues as per the remand order to conclude the matter effectively.

---

---

Issues:
1. Condonation of delay in re-filing applications.
2. Appeal against ITAT order regarding depreciation on electronic meters.
3. Whether AO should strictly comply with remand order.

Issue 1: Condonation of delay in re-filing applications:
The court allowed the exemptions sought in CM Appl. 248/2020 and 265/2020, subject to exceptions, after condoning a delay of 107 days in re-filing the applications as per the reasons stated.

Issue 2: Appeal against ITAT order regarding depreciation on electronic meters:
The Revenue appealed against the ITAT order dated 25.03.2019, which set aside the AO's order for exceeding the remand scope directed on 05.10.2015. The Tribunal had remanded the matter to determine energy-saving electronic meters entitled to 80% depreciation. The AO's decision that these meters were not energy-saving devices was deemed beyond jurisdiction. The court noted the need for the AO to address outstanding issues as per the remand order to attain finality.

Issue 3: Whether AO should strictly comply with remand order:
The appellant argued for strict compliance with the remand order of 05.10.2015, emphasizing the need for the AO to determine the percentage of energy-saving meters and the role of bus bars. The respondent contended that the issue of high depreciation on energy-saving meters was settled by the Tribunal and the Court. The court agreed with the respondent but directed the AO to address the unresolved issues as per the remand order for finality, limiting consideration to the specified paragraphs of the order.

In summary, the judgment addressed the condonation of delay in re-filing applications, the appeal against the ITAT order regarding depreciation on electronic meters, and the requirement for the AO to strictly comply with the remand order to resolve outstanding issues conclusively. The court emphasized the need for the AO to adhere to the remand order's directives for a comprehensive determination of the issues at hand.

---