Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the courts at Delhi had territorial jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 where the cheque was drawn on a foreign bank branch but was presented for collection through the complainant's account in Delhi.
Analysis: The amended jurisdictional scheme under Section 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 confers exclusive jurisdiction on the court within whose local jurisdiction the branch of the bank where the payee or holder in due course maintains the account is situated, when the cheque is delivered for collection through an account. The non obstante clause in Section 142A(1) gives overriding effect to this scheme over the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the jurisdictional principle has been affirmed by the Supreme Court. Since the cheque was presented for encashment through the complainant's bank account in Delhi, the Delhi court fell within the statutorily designated jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The challenge to territorial jurisdiction failed, and the complaint was maintainable before the Delhi court.
Final Conclusion: The petition seeking quashing of the complaint was rejected on merits, and the connected applications were disposed of accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: In a cheque dishonour case, where the cheque is delivered for collection through the payee's account, territorial jurisdiction lies exclusively with the court where the payee's bank branch is situated, notwithstanding the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.