Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (12) TMI 1089 - Commissioner - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellate Authority Overturns Penalties Imposed for Minor E-Way Bill Errors The appellate authority found the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act unwarranted. It was determined that minor mistakes in the E-way ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appellate Authority Overturns Penalties Imposed for Minor E-Way Bill Errors

                            The appellate authority found the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act unwarranted. It was determined that minor mistakes in the E-way Bill should only attract a penalty of Rs. 500/- each under CGST and HPGST, as per relevant circulars. The authority noted that the appellant's actions did not indicate an intention to evade taxes. Consequently, the orders imposing penalties were set aside, and the additional demand was ordered to be refunded. A penalty of Rs. 500/- under SGST and Rs. 500/- under CGST was imposed on the taxpayer in accordance with the GST Circular.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act, 2017.
                            2. Minor mistakes in E-way Bill and their implications.
                            3. Adherence to the principles of natural justice.
                            4. Double taxation concerns.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act, 2017:

                            The appellant contested the penalty imposed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes & Excise, Chamba, for a clerical error in the vehicle number mentioned in the E-way Bill. The vehicle number was incorrectly entered as HP32A1597 instead of HP32A3097. The goods were detained under Section 129(1) of the CGST/HPGST Act, 2017. The appellant argued that the mistake was inadvertent and did not indicate an intention to evade tax. The adjudicating authority, however, imposed a penalty, asserting that there was an intention to evade tax.

                            2. Minor mistakes in E-way Bill and their implications:

                            The appellant argued that all material particulars of the invoice and goods matched, except for the minor clerical error in the vehicle number. They cited Rule 138 of the CGST Rules, 2017, which emphasizes the importance of Part A of the E-way Bill over Part B. The appellant referred to GST Council Circular No. 64/38/2018 dated 14th September 2018, which provides for minor penalties in cases of minor mistakes, such as errors in one or two digits of the vehicle number. The appellant contended that the penalty should be limited to Rs. 500/- each under CGST and HPGST, as per the circular.

                            3. Adherence to the principles of natural justice:

                            The appellant claimed that the order was passed without issuing a show-cause notice, violating the principles of natural justice. They cited Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates issuing a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and providing an opportunity for the concerned person to be heard before determining any tax, interest, or penalty. The appellant argued that the adjudicating authority bypassed this legal requirement, rendering the order invalid.

                            4. Double taxation concerns:

                            The appellant argued that the same transaction could not be taxed twice. They stated that they had already discharged IGST on the entire value of the goods supplied, and the adjudicating authority's demand for CGST and HPGST led to double taxation. They asserted that this action violated the basic principles of equity and natural justice, as well as the intention and mandate of the GST law.

                            Judgment:

                            The appellate authority found that the penalty imposed under Section 129 was unwarranted. The GST Council Circular No. 64/38/2018 dated 14th September 2018, and the corresponding HP circular, provided that minor mistakes in the E-way Bill, such as errors in one or two digits of the vehicle number, should attract a penalty of Rs. 500/- each under CGST and HPGST. The authority noted that the circulars were not merely advisory but had to be followed. The respondents failed to prove that the appellant was using the wrong vehicle numbers as a modus operandi to evade taxes.

                            Therefore, the orders of the ACST&E, Chamba, were set aside, and the additional demand deposited by the appellant was ordered to be refunded. A penalty of Rs. 500/- under SGST and Rs. 500/- under CGST was imposed on the taxpayer in accordance with the GST Circular. The judgment was reserved on 01.11.2019 and released subsequently.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found