Revision of Board's Report permitted where omissions were inadvertent and procedural requirements were strictly satisfied.

A company may revise its Board's Report where the original omissions are inadvertent and not materially prejudicial, provided the application complies with the governing procedural requirements. The Tribunal noted that the proposed revision did not harm the company, shareholders, or other stakeholders, and that no statutory objection was raised after notice. On that basis, revision was permitted, but only subject to strict compliance with the prescribed procedural rule for such applications.

---

---

Issues: Whether the company should be permitted to revise its Board's Report for the financial year 2015-16 under Section 131(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, subject to compliance with Rule 77 of the NCLT Rules, 2016.

Analysis: The omissions in the original Board's Report were found to be inadvertent and not serious in nature. The proposed revision was held not to prejudice the company, its shareholders, or other stakeholders, and no objection was received from the statutory authorities despite notice. The Tribunal accepted that the application was made in accordance with the governing procedure and that revision could be allowed consistent with the statutory framework, provided the prescribed Rule 77 requirements were followed.

Conclusion: Permission to revise the Board's Report was granted, subject to strict compliance with Rule 77 of the NCLT Rules, 2016.

---