Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be permitted to deposit 20% of the remaining amount of disputed tax and whether recovery of the balance amount would remain stayed on such deposit.
Analysis: The petition was filed because the second appellate tribunal under the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had not yet been constituted. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the disputed tax liability while filing the first appeal. The Court accepted the request to make the further statutory deposit and indicated that, upon deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax, recovery of the balance would remain stayed in terms of the statutory scheme governing second appeal.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to deposit 20% of the remaining disputed tax, and recovery of the balance amount was ordered to remain stayed on such deposit.