Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of printed materials manufactured to a customer's specifications constituted a works contract and not a sale liable to tax under the Central Sales Tax regime for the assessment year 1994-1995.
Analysis: The dispute was governed by the earlier Division Bench decision holding that printed labels or materials prepared to suit a particular customer do not amount to marketable goods sold as such, but form part of a works contract where the dominant nature of the transaction is execution of work. The Court also noted that the extended statutory definition relied upon for taxing such transactions under the Central Sales Tax law came into force only from 11.05.2002, whereas the assessment year in question was 1994-1995. On that footing, the revisional authority could not sustain tax on the impugned transactions.
Conclusion: The transaction was a works contract and not a sale for the relevant period, and the levy under the Central Sales Tax law was unsustainable for the assessment year concerned.
Ratio Decidendi: Printed materials prepared and supplied to meet specific customer requirements, for a period prior to the statutory expansion of the sales definition, are to be treated as works contract transactions and not taxable sales under the Central Sales Tax law.