Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed by the Commissioner under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 was appealable before the Commissioner (Appeals) and whether the order dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for decision on merits.
Analysis: The order under challenge had been passed under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994, which deals with assessment or re-assessment of taxable service. Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 expressly provides that a person aggrieved by an assessment order passed under Sections 71, 72 or 73, or by an order levying interest or penalty under the chapter, may appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). In view of this statutory scheme and the earlier tribunal ruling relied upon, the appellate remedy lay before the Commissioner (Appeals), and the objection that the Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction could not stand.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication on merits.