Invalid Re-assessment Proceeding: Deceased Assessee

The Tribunal held that the initiation of re-assessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the name of a deceased person was illegal and void ab-initio. Despite the assessee's participation in the proceedings, the defect of the notice being issued in the deceased person's name could not be cured. Therefore, the initiation of re-assessment proceedings and the subsequent assessment order were declared void ab-initio, leading to the appeal being allowed.

---

---

Issues:
1. Initiation of re-assessment proceedings.

Analysis:
The appeal pertains to the initiation of re-assessment proceedings by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06. The notice for re-assessment was issued in the name of a deceased person, Late Ashok N. Dukare, through his Legal Heir, Archana Ashok Dukare. The assessee challenged the initiation of re-assessment proceedings before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) contending that the notice issued in the name of a deceased person was invalid. However, the CIT(A) rejected the contention stating that there was no illegality in the issuance of notice through the Legal Heir and that the assessee had participated in the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal examined the facts and legal precedents in similar cases. The Tribunal noted that the notice issued in the name of the deceased person after five years from his death was illegal and void ab-initio. Citing judgments of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, the Tribunal held that participation in the proceedings by the assessee cannot cure the defect of the notice being issued in the name of a deceased person. Therefore, the initiation of re-assessment proceedings and the subsequent assessment order in the name of the deceased were declared void ab-initio, and the assessment order was set aside.

The Tribunal's decision on the legal issue of the initiation of re-assessment proceedings rendered the need to address the grounds on merits unnecessary. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the Open Court on 15th November.

---