Tribunal overturns Customs Act penalties for pre-restriction digital copier import

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order regarding the confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision was based on the finding that the import of Multi Functional Digital copiers before the restriction date was permissible, rendering the confiscation and associated penalties invalid.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against Order-in-Appeal involving confiscation of imported Multi Functional Digital copiers, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty under Customs Act, 1962.

Confiscation of Goods: The appellant challenged the confiscation of the goods under section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, arguing that the MFD copiers imported were not restricted prior to 05.06.2012. The Revenue contended that all copiers, including MFD copiers, should be treated as restricted once photocopiers are restricted. The Tribunal referred to precedents and held that import of MFD copiers before the restriction date was not prohibited. Therefore, the confiscation under section 111(d) was deemed unsustainable and set aside.

Redemption Fine: The redemption fine imposed under section 125 was challenged along with the confiscation. Since the confiscation was found unjustified, the Tribunal also set aside the redemption fine, as it was directly linked to the confiscation.

Penalty Imposition: The penalty imposed under section 112(a) was contested based on the goods being held liable for confiscation. As the goods were not deemed confiscable, the penalty was considered unwarranted and set aside. The Tribunal clarified that the penalty was a consequence of the confiscation, and since the confiscation was overturned, the penalty was also nullified.

Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order regarding the confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalty. The decision was based on the finding that the import of MFD copiers before the restriction date was permissible, rendering the confiscation and associated penalties invalid.

---