Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s deletion of penalties on depreciation claims, ruling in favor of assessee.

The Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties and disallowances by the CIT(A) concerning claims related to depreciation on the fall in value of investment and software expenditure. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal relying on judicial precedents and decisions of the High Court, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Claim of depreciation on the fall in value of investment.
3. Claim of depreciation on software expenditure.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The Revenue appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which deleted the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was initially imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on the disallowance of claims related to depreciation on the fall in value of investment and software expenditure. However, the Tribunal noted that the quantum addition in respect of the claim of depreciation on the fall in value of investment had been deleted by the Tribunal, and the claim of expenditure on software had been allowed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. Consequently, the Tribunal found no basis for the penalty and upheld the deletion of the penalty by the CIT(A).

2. Claim of depreciation on the fall in value of investment:
The Tribunal, in its quantum appeal, referenced ITA Nos. 6795 and 6796/DEL/2013, where it was held that the claim of loss due to the transfer of securities from the 'available for sale' category to the 'held to maturity' category was allowable. This decision was based on the Reserve Bank of India's circular on prudential norms for classification, valuation, and operation of the investment portfolio of banks. The Tribunal cited several judicial precedents, including decisions from the Karnataka High Court and Bombay High Court, which supported the assessee's claim. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi further confirmed this view, noting that the assessee had consistently reflected the investment as stock-in-trade and the depreciation was allowable. The Tribunal, therefore, deleted the disallowance of Rs. 209.99 crores and Rs. 119.55 crores for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, respectively.

3. Claim of depreciation on software expenditure:
Initially, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee and upheld the disallowance by the CIT(A), who had distinguished between allowable AMC charges and disallowed license fees for oracle database and antivirus software due to the lack of evidence that they were for a particular period. However, the matter was taken to the Hon'ble High Court, which held that the nature of the software expenditure resulted in an enduring advantage to the assessee. The High Court opined that such specific customized software, essential for the banking activities of the assessee, should be considered as revenue expenditure. Consequently, the High Court allowed the appeal, answering the question of law in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.

Conclusion:
Given the above findings, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of penalties and disallowances by the CIT(A) based on the judicial precedents and decisions of the Hon'ble High Court. The appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos. 5845 & 5846/DEL/2016 were dismissed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 11.12.2019.

---