Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash subsidy received from the export promotion council and profits from sale of import entitlements formed part of the profits and gains derived from export of goods for rebate under clause 2(5)(a) of the Finance Act, 1966.
Analysis: The rebate under section 2(5)(a)(i) of the Finance Act, 1966 had to be computed in accordance with section 2(5)(d) and Rule 2(2) of the Income-tax (Determination of Export Profits) Rules, 1966. On that basis, the qualifying export income was to be ascertained under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The subsidy was directly linked to the loss sustained on export, and the import entitlement proceeds arose from export performance. Both receipts were therefore business receipts referable to the export activity and were includible in computing export profits. The argument that only profits proximately caused by the export qualified was rejected because the receipts were directly connected with the exports and were required to be treated as export-derived profits under the statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The receipts from cash subsidy and sale of import entitlements were includible in the profits and gains derived from export, and the assessee was entitled to rebate.