Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additional remuneration received by the assesessees under the company resolution dated 20 June 1959 was taxable as salary or as income from business or profession.
Analysis: The remuneration under the first resolution was expressly described as salary, while the second resolution provided that the additional payment was in addition to the existing remuneration. The company itself executed the fresh contracts and bore the profit and loss from them, so the assessees had no independent profit-making venture in relation to those contracts. The resolutions did not establish that the additional payment was for independent professional services or technical advice rendered as outside consultants. The factual setting showed that the assessees had accepted employment with the company for attending to its works, and the authorities and precedents relied upon by the assessees did not alter that conclusion on these facts.
Conclusion: The additional remuneration was taxable as salary and not as income from business or profession, and the question was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: Where remuneration is paid by a company to its directors under resolutions that form part of their employment arrangement, and the company alone executes the contracts and bears the attendant profit or loss, the payment is salary unless the assessee establishes a distinct independent business or professional relationship.