Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a proprietorship concern converted into a partnership firm, with the proprietor continuing as a partner, was required to obtain a fresh registration certificate or whether amendment of the existing registration certificate was sufficient under the VAT regime.
Analysis: Section 17 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 permits amendment of a registration certificate where there is a change in the name, ownership or constitution of the business, and its Explanation declares that where a firm undergoes a change in constitution without dissolution, a fresh certificate is not required. Section 75 requires a dealer to intimate changes in business constitution within the prescribed time, and Rule 33 prescribes the manner and form for such intimation and consequential amendment. The record showed timely submission of Form XII and no finding that the statutory intimation was not given within time. The earlier Division Bench view in a similar situation also supported amendment rather than fresh registration.
Conclusion: Amendment of the existing registration certificate was permissible and a fresh registration was not required. The rejection of the amendment application was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a proprietorship is converted into a partnership without dissolution and the statutory intimation of change is furnished within time, the registration certificate must be amended and a fresh registration cannot be insisted upon.