Plain statutory meaning controls classification: coconut oil, medicament and starch were placed under their specific tax entries.

Tax classification turned on commercial identity and the plain scope of the entry: parachute coconut oil was not reopened for fresh reconsideration and its classification was left undisturbed. Medikar, used as an anti-lice preparation with medicinal and therapeutic properties, was treated as a medicament rather than shampoo because a product intended to treat a bodily condition falls within the medicament entry. Revive Instant Starch was held to fall within the unqualified entry for starch, since no edible or inedible limitation could be read into the statute; the specific entry prevailed over any residuary classification.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether parachute coconut oil was correctly classified as hair oil and not as oil of all kinds or edible oil; (ii) whether Medikar was correctly classified as a medicament and not as shampoo; (iii) whether Revive Instant Starch was correctly classified as starch under Entry 118 of Schedule II Part A of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008.

Issue (i): Whether parachute coconut oil was correctly classified as hair oil and not as oil of all kinds or edible oil.

Analysis: The product-wise classification had already been settled in earlier decisions. For parachute coconut oil, the controlling view was that the product, though labelled as edible, was to be classified according to its commercial identity and the relevant entry covering the commodity as treated by the Court in the earlier matter. The dispute was therefore not open for fresh reconsideration.

Conclusion: The classification of parachute coconut oil was not disturbed and the issue was decided against the revisionist.

Issue (ii): Whether Medikar was correctly classified as a medicament and not as shampoo.

Analysis: The product was treated as an anti-lice preparation used for treatment of lice infestation, with medicinal properties and therapeutic use. A product having active ingredients intended to treat a condition of the human body was held to be a medicament, and once so regarded it could not be treated as a shampoo for tax classification purposes.

Conclusion: Medikar was held to be a medicament and the issue was decided against the revisionist.

Issue (iii): Whether Revive Instant Starch was correctly classified as starch under Entry 118 of Schedule II Part A of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008.

Analysis: The relevant entry used the word "starch" without qualifying it as edible or inedible. The Court held that where the Legislature had not made such a distinction, no additional limitation could be read into the entry. The attempt to confine the entry to edible starch by reference to surrounding commodities and principles of ejusdem generis was rejected, because the statutory language was broad enough to cover starch in its various forms. The product therefore fell within the specific tariff entry rather than the residuary category. The rule that a specific entry prevails over a residuary entry also supported the classification.

Conclusion: Revive Instant Starch was held to fall within Entry 118 as starch and the issue was decided against the revisionist.

Final Conclusion: All the framed questions were answered in favour of the revenue position adopted below, and no interference with the impugned classification findings was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing entry uses a broad commodity description without qualifying words, the Court will not read in a limitation not expressed by the Legislature, and a specific classification entry must be applied according to its plain commercial and statutory meaning rather than by importing a residuary or restrictive interpretation.

---