TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Vehicle Registration Fees Not Taxable as Business Support Services, Tribunal Rules in Favor of Appeals.</h1> <h3>Sehgal Autoriders Pvt Ltd, Gems Automobiles (P) Ltd, Kundan Cars Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise</h3> Sehgal Autoriders Pvt Ltd, Gems Automobiles (P) Ltd, Kundan Cars Pvt Ltd Versus Commissioner of Central Excise - TMI Issues:Leviability of tax as provider of 'support service of business or commerce' under section 65(104c) of Finance Act, 1994 on charges collected for vehicle registration and obtaining smart card.Comprehensive Analysis:Issue 1: Leviability of Tax on Charges Collected for Vehicle Registration and Smart Card:The appeals revolved around the question of whether tax is applicable on charges collected by the appellants for registering vehicles under Motor Vehicles Rules and obtaining smart cards for buyers, under the category of 'support service of business or commerce' as per section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal analyzed the submissions made by both sides and referred to previous decisions in similar cases to reach a conclusion.Issue 2: Interpretation of 'Business Support Services' Definition:The Tribunal delved into the definition of 'support services of business or commerce' as per section 65(104c) of the Finance Act, which includes various services related to business operations. The Tribunal scrutinized whether the services provided by the appellants, such as RTO registration and handling charges, fell within the ambit of this definition. The Tribunal highlighted that the definition encompasses specific services and that the charges collected did not align with those services as per the statutory provision.Issue 3: Precedent and Judicial Interpretation:In citing the decisions in Kundan Cars Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise and Wonder Cars Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of judicial precedent in determining tax liability. The Tribunal underscored that the charges collected by the appellants, including RTO registration fees and smart card charges, did not qualify as 'Business Support Services' based on the judicial interpretations in previous cases.Issue 4: Decision and Ruling:Based on the analysis of the statutory definition, precedent cases, and the specific services provided by the appellants, the Tribunal concluded that the charges collected for vehicle registration and smart cards did not fall under the category of 'Business Support Services'. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, aligning with the rationale presented in the Wonder Cars Pvt Ltd case, where similar charges were deemed not taxable under the specified category.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment clarified the tax liability concerning charges collected for vehicle registration and smart cards, emphasizing the interpretation of 'Business Support Services' and relying on judicial precedents to arrive at a decision favoring the appellants.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
