TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds income estimation due to unverified transactions, dismissing revenue's appeal.</h1> <h3>Income Tax Officer-28 (1) (1) Mumbai Versus Anil Narayan Lokre</h3> Income Tax Officer-28 (1) (1) Mumbai Versus Anil Narayan Lokre - TMI Issues:Addition on account of alleged bogus purchases.Analysis:The appeal by the revenue for Assessment Year 2009-10 challenges the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) regarding addition on account of alleged bogus purchases. The appellant did not appear, and no valid adjournment application was on record, leading to an ex-parte proceeding. The assessee, a resident individual engaged in manufacturing transformers, was assessed for the impugned year with an income of Rs. 7.55 Lacs after addition of alleged bogus purchases worth Rs. 2.00 Lacs. The case was reopened based on information from DGIT (investigation) regarding bogus purchase bills amounting to Rs. 8.01 Lacs from 3 entities. Despite the assessee's defense with documentary evidence, failure to confirm transactions through notices led to estimated additions of 25% of the purchases.The first appellate authority reduced the estimation to 15%, which the revenue appealed. The Tribunal observed that there could be no sale without actual purchase of material in the assessee's business. Although the assessee had primary purchase documents and made payments through banking channels, the inability to produce suppliers to confirm transactions left the onus undischarged. Given the nature of the business, the estimation of 15% by the Ld. CIT(A) was deemed reasonable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the estimation of income against suspicious purchases made by the assessee.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the estimation of income at 15% due to the failure to discharge the onus of confirming transactions despite possessing primary purchase documents and making payments through banking channels. The decision was based on the nature of the assessee's business and the lack of supplier confirmation, leading to the rejection of the appeal and affirmation of the lower authority's decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
