Respondent Violated CGST Act, 2017, Ordered to Pass Refund, Reduce Prices, Potential Penalty

The authority found that the Respondent violated Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on the additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) benefit to customers. The total profiteered amount was calculated to be Rs. 4,35,53,927/-, with a balance of Rs. 1,82,90,848/- yet to be refunded. The Respondent was ordered to pass on the balance amount to eligible recipients within three months, along with interest. Additionally, the Respondent was directed to reduce flat prices accordingly and faced a potential penalty under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. Monitoring of compliance was assigned to the Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Reduction in the rate of tax on construction service provided by the Respondent w.e.f. 01.07.2017.
2. Net additional benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) accrued to the Respondent.
3. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Respondent.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Reduction in the rate of tax on construction service provided by the Respondent w.e.f. 01.07.2017:

The DGAP's report indicated that the effective GST rate on construction services for affordable and low-cost houses was reduced from 12% to 8% post-GST. The pre-GST period only had VAT @ 5.25%. This reduction in tax rate necessitated an examination of whether the benefit of reduced tax rates was passed on to the customers.

2. Net additional benefit of ITC accrued to the Respondent:

The DGAP's investigation revealed that the ratio of ITC to turnover increased significantly post-GST, from 2.42% during the pre-GST period to 10.70% post-GST. This indicated an additional ITC benefit of 8.28% post-GST. The Respondent was required to pass on this benefit to the buyers by reducing the base price of the flats. The DGAP calculated the profiteered amount based on this additional ITC benefit and found that the Respondent had benefitted from an additional ITC of 8.28% of the taxable turnover.

3. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Respondent:

The DGAP's report concluded that the Respondent had not passed on the additional ITC benefit to the customers as required under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The total profiteered amount was calculated to be Rs. 4,35,53,927/-, including GST. The Respondent had only passed on Rs. 2,52,63,079/- to the buyers, resulting in a balance of Rs. 1,82,90,848/- yet to be refunded to the eligible recipients. The Respondent's failure to pass on the ITC benefit was deemed a contravention of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.

Judgment:

The Authority ordered the Respondent to pass on the balance amount of Rs. 1,82,90,848/- to the eligible recipients, including Rs. 11,863/- to Applicant No. 1, within three months along with interest @ 18% from the date of realization until payment. The Respondent was also directed to reduce the prices of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received. A Show Cause Notice was issued to the Respondent for imposition of penalty under Section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Commissioners of CGST/SGST Haryana were directed to monitor the compliance of this order and submit a report within four months.

---