Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was justified on the facts where the assessee, a bus operator, returned estimated income without maintaining or producing accounts and the taxing authorities found the returned income to be a deliberate under-estimate.
Analysis: The assessee was under a duty to file a true return. He did not produce the available material called for under section 22(4) and the Tribunal found that accounts were withheld. The return was not shown to be a bona fide estimate based on known facts; rather, the assessee adopted a method that did not reflect his real income, despite circumstances showing progressive increase in earning capacity and bus capacity. In such a case, a mere difference between the assessee's estimate and the assessed income does not preclude penalty. Where the assessee is in a position to know the real income but deliberately returns a lower figure, concealment can be inferred.
Conclusion: Penalty was justified. The conduct amounted to concealment of income and not merely to furnishing of inaccurate particulars.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, holding that deliberate under-estimation of known income attracts penalty for concealment under the old income-tax law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee knowingly returns an income lower than the real income, and the lower figure is not a bona fide estimate but a deliberate under-estimate, the case falls within concealment of income for penalty purposes.