1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules penalty not automatic for failure to pay tax on self-assessment within time</h1> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the failure to pay tax on self-assessment within the prescribed ... Levy Of Penalty The High Court of Punjab and Haryana considered a case where an assessee failed to pay tax on self-assessment within the prescribed period. The Income-tax Officer levied a penalty under section 140A(3), which was later reduced by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ultimately deleted the penalty as the assessee had paid the entire tax. The court held that the levy of penalty is not automatic and that the Income-tax Officer has discretion in imposing it. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty was not justified.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
