Court quashes orders rejecting rebate claims, citing no court fee needed for such claims

The Court quashed the orders of the Revisional Authority dated 5th December 2018 and 19th August 2019, which rejected the petitioner's rebate claims totaling Rs. 67,73,865. The Court held that no court fee was required for rebate claims under Section 35EE(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. As the Revisional Authority's decision was based on a technicality regarding court fee payment, the Court remanded the matter for a fresh decision on merits. The petitioner's application was allowed, and the stay application was disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order dated 5th December, 2018 by Revisional Authority and order dated 19th August, 2019.

Analysis:
1. The writ petition challenged the orders passed by the Revisional Authority on 5th December, 2018, and 19th August, 2019. The petitioner sought a rebate of Rs. 67,73,865 for 21 assignments, with show cause notices issued for rejection of rebate claims. The order-in-original rejected the claims, leading to an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and subsequently a Revision Application before the Revisional Authority under Section 35EE(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

2. The petitioner contended that under Section 35EE(3) of the Act, no court fee is required for rebate claims. Despite initially paying Rs. 1,000 as court fee, the Revisional Authority claimed a deficit of Rs. 800. However, the law does not mandate court fee payment for rebate claims. The Revisional Authority's failure to appreciate this aspect led to the dismissal of the revision application on technical grounds.

3. The Court noted that the petitioner was not liable to pay any court fee as per the provisions of Section 35EE(3) for the rebate claim amounting to Rs. 67,73,865. Consequently, the orders passed by the Revisional Authority were quashed, and the matter was remanded for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with the law and evidence on record. The petitioner's application was allowed, and the stay application was disposed of in light of the final order in the writ petition.

---