Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of a half share in a medical shop with medicines and furniture amounted to a gift of future property or a gift of existing property under the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The statutory definitions of gift, transfer of property, and property were broad enough to include any interest in movable or immovable property. The settlement deed effected a transfer of the donor's proprietary interest in the existing business assets in praesenti, while reserving only a life interest to enjoy the profits. Such reservation of limited enjoyment did not convert the transaction into a gift of future property. Authorities dealing with joint family property were inapplicable because the gifted assets were not joint family property and the donor had power to dispose of them.
Conclusion: The transfer was a valid gift in praesenti of existing property and not a gift in futuro; the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the department.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the gift was held taxable under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of an existing proprietary interest in movable property is a gift in praesenti under the Gift-tax Act even if the donor reserves only a limited life interest in the enjoyment of the profits.