TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court quashes goods detention due to invoice discrepancies, emphasizing GST Act aim.</h1> <h3>ALFA GROUP Versus THE ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, ALAPPUZHA AND THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA</h3> The court quashes the notice detaining goods due to discrepancies in invoice value and HSN code entry, finding the reasons provided insufficient under ... Release of detained goods - detention on the ground that the value quoted in the invoice that accompanied the goods was low when compared to the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of the goods - It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the reasons given in Ext.P2 order of detention do not justify a detention of the goods under Section 129 or under Section 130, and therefore, a direction ought to be issued to the respondents to immediately release the goods belonging to the petitioner. HELD THAT:- None of the reasons stated in Ext.P2 order justify detention of the goods. There is no provision under the GST Act which mandates that the goods shall not be sold at prices below the MRP declared thereon. Further, there is nothing in Ext.P2 order that shows that, on account of the alleged wrong classification of the goods there was any difference in the rate of tax that was adopted by the assessee - In my view when the statutory scheme of the GST Act is such as to facilitate a free movement of goods, after self assessment by the assessees concerned, the respondents cannot resort to an arbitrary and statutorily unwarranted detention of goods in the course of transportation. The respondents are directed to forthwith release the goods belonging to the petitioner on the petitioner producing a copy of this judgment before the said authority - petition allowed. Issues:Challenge against Ext.P2 notice for detention of goods due to low invoice value compared to MRP and alleged wrong HSN code entry.Analysis:The Writ Petition challenges Ext.P2 notice detaining goods of the petitioner in a parcel godown based on discrepancies in the invoice value and HSN code entry. The petitioner argues that the reasons in Ext.P2 do not warrant detention under Section 129 or 130, seeking immediate release of the goods. Upon hearing both parties, the court finds that none of the reasons in Ext.P2 justify the detention. It is noted that the GST Act does not mandate goods to be sold at prices above MRP, and there is no indication that the alleged wrong classification affected the tax rate. The court emphasizes the GST Act's intent to facilitate free movement of goods after self-assessment by taxpayers, criticizing arbitrary detentions that undermine public confidence in the tax system and the economy. Consequently, the court quashes Ext.P2 detention order and orders immediate release of the goods upon production of the judgment. Additionally, the Commissioner is directed to issue instructions to prevent such unwarranted detentions in the future, with the Registry tasked to inform the Commissioner for necessary action.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
