Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit of additional duty paid under Target Plus certificates could be denied after discontinuance of the scheme.
Analysis: The entitlement to utilise duty credit certificates issued under the Target Plus Scheme was held to fall within the domain of the customs authorities. The certificates had been allowed by the customs side and no customs demand had been raised. Notification No. 73/2006-Cus was issued after withdrawal of the scheme and permitted utilisation of certificates issued under the scheme on the basis of incremental FOB exports for the relevant period. Notification No. 32/2005-Cus also continued to operate, and its condition permitting credit of additional duty remained available despite the discontinuance of the scheme. The Revenue's objection based only on abolition of the scheme was therefore not accepted.
Conclusion: The credit could not be denied and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the assessee's entitlement to the credit was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification continuing to permit credit remains in force, and the customs authorities have allowed utilisation of duty credit certificates issued under the scheme, discontinuance of the scheme by itself does not justify denial of Cenvat credit by the excise authorities.