Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amendment agreement executed between the parties had the effect of superseding the earlier contract and extinguishing the arbitration agreement contained therein.
Analysis: The parties had executed an amendment agreement that recorded revised rates, treated the amended arrangement as part of the original agreement, and declared that pending claims stood buried, no further claims would be raised, and there would be no arbitration for settlement of claims. The earlier arbitration arrangement could not survive once the parties had consciously substituted the original contractual arrangement with a new one and agreed to a final settlement of claims. The mere absence of an express amendment to the clause referring to arbitration machinery did not revive a substantive arbitration right that had already been given up by the amended bargain.
Conclusion: The arbitration agreement did not subsist on the date of filing of the petition and the petition invoking arbitration was not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where parties substitute or alter the original contract by a later agreement that records final settlement and disclaims further claims and arbitration, the arbitration clause in the earlier contract perishes with it unless the later agreement preserves that right.