Disputed Section 80-O interpretation fell outside summary adjustment, so additional tax under Section 143(1A) was not leviable.

A disputed claim under Section 80-O could not be adjusted in intimation under Section 143(1)(a) because the issue depended on a contested interpretation of whether qualifying income had to be computed on a gross or net basis. Conflicting judicial views showed that the claim was not a prima facie matter capable of summary adjustment on the return alone. It therefore had to be examined in regular assessment, outside the limited scope of Section 143(1)(a). As a result, additional tax under Section 143(1A) was not leviable on the basis of that adjustment.

---

---

Issues: Whether, for the relevant assessment years, the assessee's claim under Section 80-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be subjected to adjustment under Section 143(1)(a), and whether additional tax under Section 143(1A) was leviable.

Analysis: The adjustment made in the intimation involved a disputed question of interpretation as to whether the qualifying income was to be taken on a gross basis or a net basis. The record disclosed conflicting judicial views on the point. In such circumstances, the matter could not be treated as a prima facie admissible or inadmissible claim on the basis of the return alone, and therefore did not fall within the limited scope of prima facie adjustments contemplated by the first proviso to Section 143(1)(a). The question was one for regular assessment and not for adjustment under the summary procedure.

Conclusion: Section 143(1)(a) was not applicable to the disputed claim, and the assessee was not liable to pay additional tax under Section 143(1A).

---