Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal dismissed due to lack of contract inclusion, executive clarification not binding.</h1> <h3>M/s. GMR Infrastructure Ltd. Versus Commr. of Customs (Exp.), Mumbai</h3> M/s. GMR Infrastructure Ltd. Versus Commr. of Customs (Exp.), Mumbai - 2019 (370) E.L.T. 1758 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues Involved:1. Classification of imported goods.2. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 621/2002-Cus.3. Applicability of clarifications issued by the Tax Research Unit.4. Precedential value of prior tribunal decisions and Supreme Court judgments.Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Imported Goods:The appellants filed a Bill of Entry for the clearance of 'Electronic Sensor Paver Vogel Model 1800-2 with AB 600-2-TV for laying bituminous pavement up to 9 meters along with multiplex big SKJ and its accessories,' claiming classification under CTH 84306100. The Assessing Authority denied the exemption benefit, stating the goods imported were not covered under the specified exemption, which was for 'Electronic Paver Finisher (with sensor device) for laying Bituminous pavement 7 meters size and above.' The Commissioner (Appeal) upheld this assessment.2. Eligibility for Exemption under Notification No. 621/2002-Cus:The appellants claimed the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 621/2002-Cus, which was denied on the grounds that the appellant, being a subcontractor, did not figure in the main contract between GHVPL and NHAI. The assessing authority and the appellate authority both concluded that the name of the appellant did not appear in the main contract, thus disqualifying them from the exemption.3. Applicability of Clarifications Issued by the Tax Research Unit:The appellants argued that a clarification issued by the Joint Secretary (Tax Research Unit) on 10th July 2014 supported their claim. The clarification stated that road construction machinery imported duty-free could be sold within 5 years of importation on payment of customs duty on depreciated value and that individual constituents of a consortium whose names appear in the contract could import goods under the said notification. The appellants contended that this clarification should apply to their case.4. Precedential Value of Prior Tribunal Decisions and Supreme Court Judgments:The tribunal noted that the issue was covered by the Supreme Court's decision in Gammon India Ltd [2011 (269) ELT 289 (SC)], which held that the benefit of the exemption notification could not be extended to entities not explicitly mentioned in the contract. The tribunal also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Ratan Melting & Wires Industries [2008 (231) ELT 22 (SC)], which stated that clarifications or circulars issued by the executive are not binding on the courts if they contradict statutory provisions or judicial pronouncements.Conclusion:The tribunal concluded that the appellants were not entitled to the exemption benefit as their name did not appear in the main contract, and the issue was already settled by the Supreme Court in Gammon India Ltd. The tribunal also rejected the applicability of the subsequent clarification issued by the Joint Secretary (TRU), citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Ratan Melting & Wires Industries, which emphasized that executive clarifications cannot override judicial decisions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.Order:The appeal was dismissed, with the order pronounced in open court on 01.11.2019.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found