Section 68 share capital evidence: opening balances escape addition, and documented investor identity and creditworthiness shift the burden to Revenue.

Section 68 applies only to credits arising in the relevant previous year, so share application money received in earlier years and carried forward as opening balance could not be taxed in the year under appeal. For share capital and share premium received during the year, the assessee can discharge the onus by producing primary evidence of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness, including PAN, returns, bank records, audited accounts and ROC documents. Once such evidence is produced, the burden shifts to the Revenue to conduct meaningful enquiry. The amended proviso to section 68 for closely held companies was not applicable to the year in question, and non-appearance of some directors did not by itself displace the documentary evidence.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the sum of Rs. 31,75,000, being share application money received in earlier years and carried forward, could be added under section 68 in the assessment year under appeal; and (ii) whether the balance share capital and share premium of Rs. 2,66,00,000 received during the year was proved by the assessee to the extent of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share subscribers and the transactions.

Issue (i): Whether the sum of Rs. 31,75,000, being share application money received in earlier years and carried forward, could be added under section 68 in the assessment year under appeal.

Analysis: Section 68 applies to sums credited in the relevant previous year. The amount of Rs. 31,75,000 had been received in earlier years and formed part of opening balances in the year under appeal. A credit which did not arise during the relevant previous year could not be taxed as unexplained cash credit in that year.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 31,75,000 was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the balance share capital and share premium of Rs. 2,66,00,000 received during the year was proved by the assessee to the extent of identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share subscribers and the transactions.

Analysis: The assessee produced PAN, income-tax returns, bank statements, audited accounts, ROC records and other supporting documents for the share applicants. The receipts were through banking channels, the applicants were identified as existing corporate entities, and the materials demonstrated sufficient funds and commercial capacity. For the assessment year in question, the amended proviso to section 68 concerning closely held companies was not applicable. The failure of some directors to appear did not by itself displace the documentary evidence, and the burden shifted to the Revenue to make further meaningful enquiry, which was not done.

Conclusion: The assessee discharged the onus under section 68 and the addition of Rs. 2,66,00,000 was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The entire addition on account of share capital and share premium was set aside, and the assessee's explanation was accepted.

Ratio Decidendi: For an addition under section 68, the assessee must establish the identity of the creditor or investor, the genuineness of the transaction, and the creditworthiness of the source in relation to the relevant year; once adequate primary evidence is produced, the burden shifts to the Revenue, and credits not received in the year under assessment cannot be taxed under section 68 for that year.

---