Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appeals before the appellate authorities were maintainable under section 22(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958; (ii) whether the gift made through entries in the books of the firm was invalid or incomplete.
Issue (i): Whether the appeals before the appellate authorities were maintainable under section 22(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: A right of appeal under section 22(1) arises only where the assessee objects to the value of the taxable gift, objects to the amount of gift-tax determined as payable, or denies liability to be assessed under the Act. The assessee throughout insisted that the gift was valid and did not challenge the valuation, the tax determined, or liability to assessment. On that footing, no appeal lay before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and consequently no second appeal lay before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The appeals were not maintainable, and the appellate orders made on the merits were without jurisdiction.
Issue (ii): Whether the gift made through entries in the books of the firm was invalid or incomplete.
Analysis: A valid gift does not in every case require physical delivery. Where debit and credit entries in the books place the gifted amount beyond the donor's control and transfer dominion to the donee, a gift can be completed by book entries. Here the amount stood in the donor's personal account in the firm's books, the transfer was recorded in those books, interest was credited to the donee, and the donee later withdrew the amount. The donor's status as a partner did not, by itself, prevent him from dealing exclusively with the amount standing to his credit.
Conclusion: The gift was valid and complete.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent that the finding invalidating the gift was quashed, but the assessment order as to the taxable gift was left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: A gift may be effectively completed by properly recorded book entries when the donor's dominion over the property is divested and the donee acquires control, and appellate jurisdiction under section 22(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, arises only when one of the statutory grounds of objection is actually raised.