High Court allows appeal withdrawal against CESTAT's Final Order, upholds Cenvat Credit demand, sets aside penalty.

The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the Revenue against the CESTAT's Final Order. The CESTAT order was upheld regarding the demand of Cenvat Credit but set aside the penalty imposed by the Central Excise Commissionerate. The appeal was withdrawn based on revised monetary limits for filing appeals, resulting in the dismissal of the case.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal against CESTAT's Final Order
2. Admissibility of Cenvat Credit on electricity generated outside the factory

Analysis:
1. The High Court heard an appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the Final Order dated 22.5.2015 passed by CESTAT, New Delhi. The CESTAT order allowed the appeal regarding the demand of Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 54,38,492 along with interest. However, the penalty equal to the Cenvat Credit amount, imposed by the Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate, Rohtak, was set aside. The substantial question of law for determination was whether electricity generated and sold outside the factory could be considered captively used for manufacturing final products, making the Cenvat Credit on inputs used in the power generation admissible under Rule 2 and 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2. Subsequently, an application was filed seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The application cited an instruction issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, revising the monetary limit for filing appeals before the Court to Rs. 1 crore. The counsel received instructions from the office of Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Rohtak, to withdraw the appeal due to the revised instructions. The amount involved in the appeal was Rs. 54,38,492. The application was supported by an affidavit from the petitioner's counsel. The Court, considering the application and affidavit, allowed the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the dismissal of CEA No.64/2015.

---