TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Parachute Coconut Oil was classifiable as hair oil or as oil of all kinds under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008. (ii) Whether Medikar was classifiable as a medicament or as a shampoo. (iii) Whether Revived Instant Starch was classifiable as starch under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008.
Issue (i): Whether Parachute Coconut Oil was classifiable as hair oil or as oil of all kinds under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008.
Analysis: The issue had already been settled in earlier proceedings. Parachute Coconut Oil was treated as hair oil and not as oil of all kinds. The classification was also linked to the entry for edible oil, on the footing that the product was marketed as edible and could not be treated as an unclassified item.
Conclusion: The classification was held in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Medikar was classifiable as a medicament or as a shampoo.
Analysis: The product was treated as an anti-lice treatment with medicinal properties. The reasoning accepted that a preparation used to treat lice on the human body is a drug or medicament, and that its medicinal use was its primary and sole function rather than a subsidiary one.
Conclusion: The classification was held in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether Revived Instant Starch was classifiable as starch under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008.
Analysis: Entry 118 of Schedule II Part A referred to starch without distinguishing between edible and inedible starch. The Court held that where the Legislature did not express such a distinction, no restrictive interpretation could be imposed. The argument based on ejusdem generis with sago and sabudana was not accepted, and the product was held to fall within the starch entry. The alternative reliance on the residuary treatment and the central excise heading did not alter the result.
Conclusion: The classification was held in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: All classification questions were answered against the revisionist and the tax revision failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In a taxing entry, where the Legislature uses a generic commodity description without drawing a distinction, the entry must be applied as written and cannot be narrowed by importing an unstated limitation such as edible versus inedible form.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
