Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under the Income-tax Act, 1961, an unregistered firm can be separately assessed when two of its partners have already been assessed individually on their share income from the partnership business.
Analysis: The old Act contained a charging provision that gave the assessing authority an option to proceed against the firm or the partners individually, but the new Act replaced that scheme. Under section 4 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with the definition of "person" in section 2(31), a firm is itself a distinct taxable entity and the charging provision does not preserve the earlier election between the firm and its partners. The Court held that the machinery provisions must operate within the framework of the charging section, and that the omission of the former option in the new Act shows a deliberate change in legislative policy. The earlier authorities under the old Act were therefore not controlling, while the view that no such election remains available under the new Act was accepted.
Conclusion: The firm could be separately assessed notwithstanding prior individual assessments of two partners; the question was answered in the affirmative, against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by upholding the validity of the assessment of the unregistered firm under the new Act even after assessment of the partners on their respective share income.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, a firm and its partners are distinct taxable entities, and the Act does not confer an option on the assessing authority to treat prior individual assessment of partners as barring separate assessment of the firm.