Reassessment notice service and limitation dispute leads to interim stay, with issue-based assessment challenged absent pending proceedings.

A challenge was raised to a reassessment order on the grounds of defective service of notice and expiry of the five-year limitation period under the reassessment framework for Assessment Year 2008-09. The text also questioned whether issue-based assessment could be initiated when no proceedings were pending, on the footing that such power operates only during pending proceedings under the Act. The court granted ad interim protection, stayed operation of the impugned order, issued notice, and kept the matter pending for further hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the impugned reassessment order could be sustained when it was alleged that no notice had been served and the limitation under the reassessment provision had expired; (ii) Whether action could be taken under the issue-based assessment provision in the absence of any pending proceedings.

Issue (i): Whether the impugned reassessment order could be sustained when it was alleged that no notice had been served and the limitation under the reassessment provision had expired.

Analysis: The challenge was based on the contention that the reassessment notice was not properly served and that the order had been passed beyond the five-year period prescribed for reassessment from the end of the relevant year. The order was stated to relate to Assessment Year 2008-2009, while the impugned order had been made on 31.07.2017.

Conclusion: The impugned order was stayed by way of ad interim relief.

Issue (ii): Whether action could be taken under the issue-based assessment provision in the absence of any pending proceedings.

Analysis: It was contended that the provision enabling issue-based assessment could operate only during the course of pending proceedings under the Act, and that no such proceeding was pending against the petitioner. Reliance was placed on earlier judicial authority to support that submission.

Conclusion: Notice was issued and the petitioner obtained interim protection against operation of the impugned order.

Final Conclusion: The matter was kept pending for further hearing while interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: No final ratio was laid down, as the order only granted interim relief and issued notice.

---