Incomplete laboratory testing cannot defeat tariff classification or exemption when the goods are not reliably shown to fall outside the claimed entry.

Incomplete and unreliable laboratory testing could not displace the importer's claimed classification of the goods as natural calcite powder. Because the departmental report omitted a material parameter, particle size, and the available oil absorption value alone was insufficient to establish that the goods were precipitated calcium carbonate, the department's classification was not sustained. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that exemption cannot be denied on the basis of incomplete testing where the goods are not shown to fall outside the claimed tariff entry. The goods were treated as natural calcite powder, and the classification, duty demand, confiscation and penalties were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported goods were correctly classifiable as natural calcite powder entitled to exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus, or as precipitated calcium carbonate falling outside the exemption.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the reliability of the laboratory test results and the proper basis for classification. The reported tests did not include particle size, though that factor was relevant to the classification dispute, and the departmental laboratory had admitted its inability to conduct that test. The oil absorption value, by itself, was insufficient to displace the importer's claimed description of the goods. In the absence of a complete and dependable test basis, the classification adopted by the department could not be sustained. The Tribunal also followed the earlier view that where the goods are not shown to be precipitated calcium carbonate meeting the relevant standard, the claimed classification and exemption cannot be denied merely on incomplete testing.

Conclusion: The goods were to be treated as natural calcite powder and the denial of exemption was not sustainable; the appeals were allowed.

Final Conclusion: The impugned classification, duty demand, confiscation and penalties were set aside, and the appellants succeeded on the tariff classification and exemption issue.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the departmental test report is incomplete on a material classification parameter and does not reliably establish that the goods fall outside the claimed tariff entry, the importer's classification cannot be displaced and the corresponding exemption cannot be denied.

---