Appeal delay due to incorrect advice condoned, ad hoc disallowances reversed, assessee favored.

The appeal, delayed by 721 days due to incorrect advice, was condoned. Ad hoc disallowances without specific justification were deemed unwarranted. The Tribunal favored the assessee, deleting the additions made on an ad hoc basis. Advertisement expenses disallowed without notifying the assessee were remitted for redetermination. Disallowance of interest expenses was reversed, noting the business purpose of loans. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, ruling in favor of the assessee on ad hoc disallowances and interest expenses.

---

---

Issues:
1. Delay in filing the appeal and condonation of delay.
2. Ad hoc disallowances made by the Assessing Officer.
3. Addition on account of advertisement expenses.
4. Disallowance of interest expenses.

Analysis:

1. Delay in filing the appeal and condonation of delay:
The appeal filed by the assessee was delayed by 721 days. The reason cited for the delay was that the assessee was wrongly advised to file a petition under section 264 of the Act, causing the delay in filing the appeal. The delay was condoned after finding a plausible cause for the delay, and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits.

2. Ad hoc disallowances made by the Assessing Officer:
The Assessing Officer had made ad hoc disallowances during the assessment proceedings without pinpointing any defect in the books of account or vouchers. The disallowances were made to cover up possible leakage without specific justification. The Tribunal held that such ad hoc disallowances are not warranted under the law and pointed out that the Assessing Officer must specify the vouchers or expenses for disallowance. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee and deleted the additions made on an ad hoc basis.

3. Addition on account of advertisement expenses:
The Assessing Officer disallowed advertisement expenses based on returned notices to parties to whom the expenses were claimed to be paid. However, the assessee was not confronted with the fact that the notices had returned. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for redetermination after providing the assessee with an opportunity to be heard, allowing the issue for statistical purposes.

4. Disallowance of interest expenses:
The Assessing Officer disallowed interest expenses paid by the assessee to relatives and non-relatives, reducing the interest rate from 18% to 15%. The Tribunal found the basis for disallowance incorrect, noting the differences in interest rates between private lenders and banks. It was established that the loans were utilized for business purposes, and the disallowance was reversed, allowing the ground of the assessee.

In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on the issues of ad hoc disallowances and disallowance of interest expenses.

---