Tribunal exempts RTO assistance income from Service Tax, cites precedent. Appeal allowed, stay petition disposed.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the income received for assisting customers with vehicle registration at the RTO did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service and was not taxable under service tax. Citing precedent from a similar case, the Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability for RTO registration fees and penalties, ultimately allowing the appeal and disposing of the stay petition on 17/09/2019.

---

---

Issues:
Taxability of income received by the appellant under Business Auxiliary Service for obtaining temporary and permanent vehicle registration with the RTO.

Analysis:
The appellants, dealers of cars, collected amounts from customers for vehicle registration with the RTO. The Department claimed the income was taxable under Business Auxiliary Service. A show-cause notice was issued, dropped by the original authority, but reviewed by the Commissioner leading to the appeal. The appellant argued the issue was settled by previous Tribunal decisions. The Department, however, supported the Order-in-Review. The Tribunal found the appellants were providing a service to customers by facilitating vehicle registration but concluded that the revenue generated did not fall under service tax unless it met specific criteria under Section 65. The Tribunal noted that the activity did not support the customer's business and referenced previous cases where similar amounts collected for registration were not taxable under service tax.

The Tribunal specifically referred to the case of Toyota Lakozy Auto Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that charges for vehicle registration with the RTO were not taxable under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax liability for RTO registration fees, citing that assisting customers with RTO registration did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service. The Tribunal also invoked Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, to set aside penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of on 17/09/2019.

---