TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Business Expenses Upheld on Appeal</h1> <h3>Income-tax Officer, Ward – 3 (2), Hyderabad Versus Rewa Tollway Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad.</h3> Income-tax Officer, Ward – 3 (2), Hyderabad Versus Rewa Tollway Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. - TMI Issues:1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.2. Disallowance of expenses by AO.3. Appeal against CIT(A)'s order on disallowance of expenses.Issue 1: Condonation of delay in filing the appealThe Revenue filed an appeal with a delay of 4 days, citing departmental procedures as the reason. The Assessee sought condonation of the delay, asserting it was unintentional. The Revenue supported the claim. The Tribunal, noting the reasonable cause, condoned the delay and admitted the appeal for adjudication.Issue 2: Disallowance of expenses by AOThe AO disallowed expenses claimed by the Assessee, including salaries, maintenance, and legal charges, totaling to Rs. 7,24,40,625. The AO found certain expenses unrelated to the business and disallowed Rs. 20,82,628. Further, the AO treated maintenance expenses as capital expenditure, disallowing Rs. 5,93,30,447. The Assessee appealed to the CIT(A) against these disallowances.Issue 3: Appeal against CIT(A)'s order on disallowance of expensesThe CIT(A) overturned the AO's disallowances. Regarding the disallowed expenses, the CIT(A) found that the Assessee had produced relevant vouchers and bills, supporting the expenses. The CIT(A) allowed the Assessee's appeal on the disallowed expenses related to travelling and legal charges. Similarly, the CIT(A) found that the maintenance expenses were incurred as per contractual obligations and were revenue expenditure, not capital. The Revenue, aggrieved by the CIT(A)'s decision, appealed to the ITAT.The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision. The Tribunal found that the Assessee's expenses on travelling and legal fees were essential for business purposes, supported by vouchers. Regarding maintenance expenses, the ITAT noted the regular incurring of such expenses as per contractual obligations. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A)'s findings that these expenses were revenue in nature and necessary for the Assessee's business operations. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision on the disallowance of expenses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
