Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reopening of assessment beyond four years under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the material relied upon was already available in the original assessment records and there was no allegation of failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts.
Analysis: The reassessment notice was issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, so the first proviso to section 147 applied. In that situation, reopening could be sustained only if income had escaped assessment because of the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The reasons recorded for reopening referred to amounts already shown in the profit and loss account and to information that was already on record in the tax audit report and the original return. No fresh tangible material had come to light after the assessment. The attempt to reopen was therefore founded on a different view of the same material already considered, which amounted to a change of opinion. Mere absence of discussion of a point in the original assessment order did not show that the point had not been examined or that the assessee had withheld material facts.
Conclusion: The reopening was invalid, barred by limitation, and liable to be quashed; the assessee succeeds.