Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Trust's Registration Refusal Upheld Due to Educational Activities Misalignment</h1> <h3>M/s Kandukuri Bangaramma Charitable Trust Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-2 Visakhapatnam</h3> M/s Kandukuri Bangaramma Charitable Trust Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-2 Visakhapatnam - TMI Issues: Refusal of registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Refusal of registration u/s 12AAThe appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) refusing registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT observed that the Trust, running a maritime engineering academy, did not impart formal education resulting in recognized degrees or certificates. The CIT relied on legal precedents to reject registration, noting the commercial basis of the academy and lack of evidence of public benefit. The Trust's surplus and fee structure were also scrutinized.Issue 2: Arguments and Counter-argumentsDuring the appeal hearing, the Trust argued its charitable nature, emphasizing educational services without profit motive. The Trust's curriculum aligned with Australian and New Zealand maritime institutions, aiming at pre-sea and advanced diploma studies. In contrast, the Revenue argued commercial operations, lack of formal education recognition, and coaching activities not affiliated with Indian institutions, challenging the Trust's charitable status.Issue 3: Tribunal's DecisionThe Tribunal analyzed the Trust's objectives, operations, and lack of formal education recognition. It noted the absence of evidence regarding student admissions and formal recognition by Indian authorities. The Tribunal highlighted complaints against the academy and the non-affiliation with Indian universities. Relying on legal precedents and the nature of coaching activities, the Tribunal upheld the CIT's decision, dismissing the Trust's appeal for registration u/s 12AA.ConclusionThe Tribunal upheld the CIT's decision to refuse registration u/s 12AA for the Trust, citing the lack of formal education recognition, commercial operations, and coaching activities not aligned with Indian educational institutions. The Trust's appeal was dismissed, affirming the original order.