Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the Tribunal set aside the original assessment and remanded the matter, the assessment for the relevant year could still be treated as completed before 1 April 1962 so as to attract the saving provision for penalty under the repealed Act, or whether the penalty proceedings were governed by the new Act.
Analysis: The original assessment order was not treated as final once the Tribunal set it aside and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. In consequence, there was no completed assessment before 1 April 1962 within the meaning of the saving provision. The later fresh assessment made after remand was the operative assessment for the purpose of penalty, and the case therefore fell within the provision enabling initiation and imposition of penalty under the new Act. The relied-upon contrary authority was distinguished on the ground that it did not involve a situation where the assessment order had been set aside and the matter remanded.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative and against the assessee, and penalty under the new Act was held to be validly leviable.