Tribunal upholds deletion of interest income addition under Income Tax Act, CIT(A) disagreement noted

The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition made under section 56 of the Income Tax Act regarding interest income, finding it linked to the project. It disagreed with the CIT(A) on interest income from GMDCL but agreed on interest income from GVI. Regarding the unutilized CENVAT credit under section 145A, the Tribunal upheld the deletion, noting it would have a tax-neutral effect. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection on interest income from GMDCL was allowed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition made under section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding interest income.
2. Deletion of addition of unutilized CENVAT credit under section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition Made Under Section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Regarding Interest Income

The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 3,81,36,986/- made under section 56 of the Act, arguing that the interest income earned was not inextricably linked with the business of the assessee and could not be reduced from capital expenditure. The assessee, a private limited company and subsidiary of Adani Enterprises Ltd. (AEL), was engaged in mining/exploration activities. AEL had assigned a contract to the assessee, which then entered into a washery agreement with GVI Info Private Ltd., providing a security deposit of Rs. 150 crores, earning interest income of Rs. 3,81,36,986/-. The assessee claimed this interest income was linked with the project and reduced it from project development expenditure. The AO found no evidence that GVI utilized the funds for the project and treated the interest income as income from other sources. The CIT(A) held the security deposit was directly linked with the project and directed the reduction of interest income from project expenditure. However, the CIT(A) confirmed the AO’s treatment of Rs. 1,04,463/- interest income from bank deposits as income from other sources, as the assessee failed to substantiate its linkage to the project.

Upon appeal, the Tribunal noted that all expenditures and incomes before the commencement of commercial production should be capitalized if inextricably linked with the project. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court judgments in CIT Vs. Bokaro Steel Ltd. and Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. to establish that the interest income from GVI was linked to the project. The Tribunal found that the AO erred in treating interest expenses and income differently when both were inextricably linked. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision regarding the interest income from GVI but disagreed with the CIT(A) on the interest income from GMDCL, allowing the assessee’s claim that it was linked to the project.

Issue 2: Deletion of Addition of Unutilized CENVAT Credit Under Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

The Revenue contested the deletion of Rs. 29,60,018/- on account of unutilized CENVAT credit. The assessee argued that the CENVAT credit pertained to services received and did not relate to inventories, thus section 145A did not apply. The AO added the CENVAT credit to the closing stock, but the CIT(A) deleted the addition, accepting the assessee’s contention that section 145A was not applicable to its service sector business. The CIT(A) also noted that even if section 145A applied, the adjustment would be revenue-neutral as it would affect purchases, sales, and inventory equally.

The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that the assessee consistently followed the exclusive method of accounting, and any adjustment to closing stock should correspondingly adjust purchases, resulting in a tax-neutral effect. The Tribunal cited the Gujarat High Court judgment in Pr.CIT vs. Gujarat Gas Company Ltd. to support this view. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)’s decision, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal regarding both issues and allowed the assessee’s cross-objection regarding the interest income from GMDCL. The order was pronounced in the court on 25/09/2019 at Ahmedabad.

---