Tribunal allows appeal on tax issues but reverses decision on book profit calculation under Section 115JB.

The tribunal partly allowed the revenue's appeal, upholding the deletion of disallowances on works contract tax, subcontractor payments, excise duty, and donations. However, the tribunal reversed the decision on adding profit from the sale of fixed assets while computing book profit under Section 115JB. The order was pronounced on 22nd March 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of disallowance on account of works contract tax.
2. Deletion of disallowance on account of unascertainable payments to subcontractors.
3. Deletion of disallowance on account of excise duty.
4. Deletion of addition on account of profit on sale of fixed assets while computing book profit u/s 115JB.
5. Deletion of disallowance on account of charities and donations.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Disallowance on Account of Works Contract Tax:
The revenue challenged the Ld. CIT(A)'s action of deleting the disallowance of Rs. 5,55,561/- made by the AO on account of works contract tax. The AO disallowed this amount, stating it did not relate to the year under consideration. The Ld. CIT(A) found that the works contract tax liability was accounted for in the year the corresponding works receipts were recognized. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim by applying the matching principle, and the tribunal upheld this decision, finding no infirmity in the Ld. CIT(A)'s order.

2. Deletion of Disallowance on Account of Unascertainable Payments to Subcontractors:
The revenue contested the deletion of Rs. 1,11,68,443/- disallowance made by the AO due to non-deduction of tax at source from labour charges. The Ld. CIT(A) found that the actual amount was Rs. 94,50,715/- and included amounts not requiring TDS. The balance amount was for unbilled sales, recognized under the percentage completion method. The tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, noting the consistent accounting method and the matching principle.

3. Deletion of Disallowance on Account of Excise Duty:
The AO disallowed Rs. 44,707/- debited by the assessee for excise duty, citing no corresponding credit in the profit and loss account. The Ld. CIT(A) found that finished goods were valued inclusive of excise duty, and the difference between closing and opening stock was credited to the profit and loss account. The tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, appreciating the inclusive method of accounting for excise duty.

4. Deletion of Addition on Account of Profit on Sale of Fixed Assets while Computing Book Profit u/s 115JB:
The AO added Rs. 3,11,81,581/- to the book profit, stating that adjustments to net profit for book profit computation are limited to specific items in the explanation to Section 115JB. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted this addition, relying on tribunal decisions that profit on sale of fixed assets should not be included in business profits. However, the tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Appollo Tyres Ltd. and the Kolkata High Court's decision in G.K.W. Ltd., confirming the AO's addition.

5. Deletion of Disallowance on Account of Charities and Donations:
The AO disallowed Rs. 10,853/- for puja donations. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted this disallowance, finding the donations were made for community goodwill and business expediency. The tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, finding no infirmity in allowing the expenses under Section 37(1) of the Act.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the revenue was partly allowed, with the tribunal upholding the Ld. CIT(A)'s decisions on works contract tax, subcontractor payments, excise duty, and donations, but reversing the decision on profit from the sale of fixed assets. The order was pronounced in the open court on 22nd March 2019.

---