TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: Sales Tax Refund to be Taxed in Assessee's Hands for A.Y. 2011-2012</h1> <h3>M/s. Subhash Chander & Co. Versus The ACIT, Circle – 38 (1), New Delhi.</h3> M/s. Subhash Chander & Co. Versus The ACIT, Circle – 38 (1), New Delhi. - TMI Issues:Challenge against addition of Sales Tax refund in the assessment for A.Y. 2011-2012.Analysis:The appeal was filed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-20, New Delhi, challenging the addition of Rs. 7,60,929/- on account of Sales Tax refund. The assessee, a Civil Contractor firm, had received the sales tax refund but had not added it to their income. The firm argued that the amount had already been shown as income in the Private Limited Company to which the assets and liabilities were transferred. However, both the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and the Ld. CIT(A) held that since the contract was awarded to the assessee firm and sales tax was deducted at the time of payment, the refund should be taxed in the hands of the assessee firm. The A.O. made the addition, and the Ld. CIT(A) upheld it, stating that statutory receipts like sales tax refund must be shown as income. The appeal contended that taxing the amount in both the firm and the Private Limited Company would result in double taxation.Upon review, the tribunal found no merit in the appeal. The counsel for the assessee argued that the amount had already been declared as income by the Private Limited Company. However, it was acknowledged that the assessee firm continued its activities and existed during the assessment year in question, as evidenced by the filed return of income. As the contract was awarded to the assessee firm and the sales tax was deducted at the time of payment, the tribunal concluded that the sales tax refund should be taxed in the hands of the assessee firm. Citing the principle that income is to be taxed in the hands of the person liable for taxation, the tribunal relied on a Supreme Court judgment to support its decision. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee.In conclusion, the appeal challenging the addition of Sales Tax refund in the assessment for A.Y. 2011-2012 was dismissed by the tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
