Prior secured creditor rights prevail over PMLA attachment where the mortgage predates enforcement and is bona fide.

A bona fide secured creditor with a prior mortgage and SARFAESI enforcement steps was held entitled to precedence over a later PMLA attachment. The Tribunal found that the bank had created and enforced its security interest before the provisional attachment, and that a lawful third-party charge is not displaced unless shown to have been created to defeat money-laundering proceedings. Because the Adjudicating Authority had not properly applied its mind to the bank's reply and the factual matrix, confirmation of the provisional attachment could not stand. The attachment was therefore quashed to the extent it could affect the bank's prior secured interest, leaving the bank free to proceed in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether a secured creditor's prior mortgage and enforcement action under the SARFAESI Act could prevail over attachment under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, and whether the impugned confirmation of provisional attachment was sustainable.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the appellant bank had created and enforced its security interest much before the attachment proceedings under the PMLA. The mortgaged property was already subject to SARFAESI measures, and the bank was a bona fide secured creditor acting in accordance with law. Relying on the governing principles that a third party's lawful charge is not void unless shown to have been created to defeat money-laundering proceedings, the Tribunal held that the attachment could operate only, if at all, subject to satisfaction of the bank's prior charge and not so as to defeat the bank's secured interest. The Tribunal also found that the Adjudicating Authority had failed to properly apply its mind to the factual matrix and the bank's reply.

Conclusion: The prior secured interest of the appellant bank was entitled to precedence over the PMLA attachment, and the confirmation of the provisional attachment could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the attachment over the mortgaged property was quashed, leaving the bank free to proceed in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide secured creditor who has created and enforced a lawful security interest before PMLA attachment is entitled to protection of that prior charge, and such property cannot be confirmed as attached except to the extent lawfully available beyond the creditor's secured claim.

---