Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 54,000 received by the assessee from tenants as pagdi or salami for grant of monthly tenancies was a capital receipt or income liable to tax.
Analysis: The receipt was found to be a non-recurring payment made by tenants for being accepted as tenants and not an advance rent. The nature of salami or premium is ordinarily capital, and the taxing authority had not established any facts showing that, in the present case, the amount was revenue in character. The fact that the payments were received from multiple tenants did not, by itself, convert the receipts into business income in the absence of evidence that the building activity formed part of the assessee's business. The attempt to assess it as income from other sources also failed on the facts found.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 54,000 was held to be a capital receipt and not taxable income.