TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Granted for Charitable Society Registration Denial</h1> <h3>M/s Baba Balaknath Gaushala Society Versus The C.I.T. (Exemptions), Chandigarh.</h3> M/s Baba Balaknath Gaushala Society Versus The C.I.T. (Exemptions), Chandigarh. - TMI Issues:- Appeal against refusal of registration as charitable society u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.- Primarily indulging in commercial activity of selling milk.- Substantial cash deposits during demonetization period.- Change in governing body not accepted by Registrar of Societies.Analysis:1. Refusal of Registration:The appeal was filed against the denial of registration as a charitable society u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) had refused registration based on various grounds, including the commercial nature of activities and lack of transparency. The society's aims and objects were centered around taking care of cows and running a gaushala. However, the Commissioner found that the society's predominant aim was the commercial activity of selling milk, as evidenced by a significant increase in receipts from milk sales in recent years.2. Commercial Activity of Selling Milk:The Commissioner noted a substantial increase in total receipts of the society due to the sale of milk, indicating a commercial nature of activities. The society's financial statements revealed a significant portion of revenue generated from milk sales, raising doubts about its charitable purpose. The Commissioner highlighted the discrepancy between the society's claims of charitable activities and the substantial income from commercial milk sales, leading to the rejection of registration.3. Substantial Cash Deposits During Demonetization:Another reason for the refusal of registration was the substantial cash deposits in the society's bank account during the demonetization period. The Commissioner raised concerns about the transparency of the society's financial transactions, especially during a period of significant currency changes. The society's involvement in cash deposits during demonetization without proper documentation cast doubt on the legitimacy of its activities.4. Change in Governing Body:The Commissioner also questioned the change in the governing body of the society, noting that there was no evidence of acceptance of the change by the Registrar of Societies. The lack of proper documentation regarding the change in the composition of the governing body raised doubts about the society's compliance with regulatory requirements. The absence of acceptance by the Registrar of Societies regarding the change further contributed to the rejection of registration.5. Appellate Tribunal Decision:Upon hearing the appeal, the Appellate Tribunal decided to restore the issue back to the Commissioner for reconsideration. The Tribunal acknowledged the contentions raised by the society's counsel, highlighting the need for further investigation and verification of crucial facts. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of examining the nature of cows owned by the society, the change in the governing body, and the source of cash deposits during demonetization before reaching a final decision on the eligibility for registration u/s 12AA.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and directed the Commissioner to reevaluate the grant of registration after providing a fair opportunity of hearing to the applicant society.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
